Triple

T26317747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject nroff E662017 entity
Predicate alternativeImplementation P162147 FINISHED
Object GNU groff nroff NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: GNU groff nroff | Statement: [nroff, alternativeImplementation, GNU groff nroff]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativeImplementation
Context triple: [nroff, alternativeImplementation, GNU groff nroff]
  • A. alternativePlan
    Indicates that one plan serves as a substitute or backup option for another plan within the same context or objective.
  • B. alternativeRoute
    Indicates that there exists a different path or option that can be taken instead of the primary or original route.
  • C. alternativeFlag
    Indicates that something is marked or designated as an alternative option or variant relative to a primary or default choice.
  • D. alternativeLaunchMethod
    Indicates that there exists a different or non-standard method by which the launch of something can be carried out.
  • E. alternativeInstrumentation
    Indicates that an entity uses a different or substitute set of instruments or instrumentation compared to a standard, primary, or original configuration.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812e73048190aae587f1d51e5a06 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f622abdfac8190988421c946411d7e completed May 2, 2026, 4:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620debeb48190b7db395fb86cf8d9 completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f621fbfc2c8190bfa802d7dc0f6aa4 completed May 2, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:26 p.m.