Triple
T26284955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Melvin Hicks |
E661110
|
entity |
| Predicate | precedentEffect |
P55794
|
FINISHED |
| Object | clarified that rejection of employer’s explanation does not compel judgment for plaintiff |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clarified that rejection of employer’s explanation does not compel judgment for plaintiff | Statement: [Melvin Hicks, precedentEffect, clarified that rejection of employer’s explanation does not compel judgment for plaintiff]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: precedentEffect Context triple: [Melvin Hicks, precedentEffect, clarified that rejection of employer’s explanation does not compel judgment for plaintiff]
-
A.
precedentFor
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
B.
modifiedPrecedent
Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
-
C.
precedentSystem
Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
-
D.
wasPrecededBy
Indicates that one event, state, or entity occurred or existed earlier in time than another.
-
E.
precedentSet
chosen
Indicates that one event, decision, or case establishes a guiding example or standard that influences how subsequent similar situations are judged or handled.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812bbd448190be4d7478b057990a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6430a93a48190854ce71df680b2fa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641da05b881909f6283c988639c53 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:04 p.m.