Triple
T2623819
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fox language |
E59069
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternativeName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mesquakie language |
E289745
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mesquakie language | Statement: [Fox language, alternativeName, Mesquakie language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mesquakie language Context triple: [Fox language, alternativeName, Mesquakie language]
-
A.
Meskwaki language
chosen
The Meskwaki language is an Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Meskwaki (Fox) people of the Great Lakes region in North America.
-
B.
Kickapoo language
Kickapoo language is an endangered Central Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Kickapoo people in parts of the United States and Mexico.
-
C.
Tataviam language
The Tataviam language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Tataviam people in what is now Southern California.
-
D.
Oneida language
The Oneida language is an Iroquoian Indigenous language traditionally spoken by the Oneida people, one of the nations of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy.
-
E.
Osage language
The Osage language is a Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Osage people of the central United States, now the focus of revitalization and preservation efforts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac558388190962492cd2e1b0ce6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd8af06fc8190ab48d746b8c8892b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:50 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afb672731881909f7df113a279e1a5 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 6:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.