Triple
T2621655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas Supreme Court |
E59020
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMinimumQuorum |
P35990
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 5 justices |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 5 justices | Statement: [Texas Supreme Court, hasMinimumQuorum, 5 justices]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMinimumQuorum Context triple: [Texas Supreme Court, hasMinimumQuorum, 5 justices]
-
A.
hasQuorum
Indicates that the number of required participants or members is sufficient to validly conduct the specified activity or decision.
-
B.
hasNumberOfVotingMembers
chosen
Indicates the specific count of individuals who hold voting rights within a given group or body.
-
C.
hasMajorityOf
Indicates that one entity possesses or controls more than half of the total quantity, members, or share of another entity.
-
D.
hasMajority
Indicates that one entity holds more than half of the total share, control, or quantity in relation to another entity or set.
-
E.
hasMajorityIn
Indicates that one entity holds more than half of the control, ownership, or representation within another entity or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac558388190962492cd2e1b0ce6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdaca581881908fe8d3d820f839b7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd80f48888190afdf7e3e042157d0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.