Triple
T26199455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | National Register of Citizens in Assam |
E655191
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealMechanism |
P19705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Foreigners Tribunals in Assam |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Foreigners Tribunals in Assam | Statement: [National Register of Citizens in Assam, appealMechanism, Foreigners Tribunals in Assam]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealMechanism Context triple: [National Register of Citizens in Assam, appealMechanism, Foreigners Tribunals in Assam]
-
A.
appealBeyond
Indicates that something has significance, relevance, or attractiveness that extends beyond a specified scope, group, or context.
-
B.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
C.
resolutionMechanism
chosen
Indicates the method, process, or system used to resolve a conflict, issue, or discrepancy between entities.
-
D.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b48236c81908fe385b6afc4f60b |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6640168948190811bd5f933a87cf5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6633451948190bcc0410602bb4914 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:47 p.m.