Triple
T26074334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Portmarnock Golf Club |
E657637
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterDesignContributionsBy |
P30146
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Harry Colt |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harry Colt | Statement: [Portmarnock Golf Club, laterDesignContributionsBy, Harry Colt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterDesignContributionsBy Context triple: [Portmarnock Golf Club, laterDesignContributionsBy, Harry Colt]
-
A.
designsBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or designer responsible for the conception or design of another entity.
-
B.
hasContributionFrom
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a work, project, or outcome) is created, influenced, or supported in part by a specified contributor.
-
C.
designSucceededBy
Indicates that one design is followed or replaced by another design in a temporal or version sequence.
-
D.
laterWorksAs
Indicates that an entity holds or takes on a particular occupation or role at a later point in time relative to another referenced time or role.
-
E.
relatedWorkByDesigner
Indicates that one work is connected to another through having been created or designed by the same designer.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbe539081909efc7f9dd7c1b53c |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71422adac8190a5ceb32dcf820833 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f712764d2c819081b64b27e5de4a13 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:32 p.m.