Triple
T26061997
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bit-Adini |
E657283
|
entity |
| Predicate | archaeologicalSiteCorrespondsTo |
P159904
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tell Ahmar |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tell Ahmar | Statement: [Bit-Adini, archaeologicalSiteCorrespondsTo, Tell Ahmar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: archaeologicalSiteCorrespondsTo Context triple: [Bit-Adini, archaeologicalSiteCorrespondsTo, Tell Ahmar]
-
A.
relatedToArchaeologicalSite
Indicates that one entity has a contextual, historical, or functional connection to an archaeological site.
-
B.
hasArchaeologicalSiteIn
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with an archaeological site located within a specified place or region.
-
C.
isArchaeologicalSite
Indicates that a location or structure is recognized as an archaeological site, typically due to its historical or cultural remains of past human activity.
-
D.
archaeologicalSiteIncludes
Indicates that an archaeological site contains, encompasses, or includes a specified feature, structure, artifact collection, or sub-area as part of its extent or composition.
-
E.
archaeologicalCorrelation
Indicates a relationship where archaeological evidence from different sources or sites is shown to be systematically related, suggesting a meaningful connection or pattern between them.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbd788481909e22bd7153d0c037 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60692a4f081909cd9d0ca75d590a0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5aff889988190ad10bcf1a280f717 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:18 p.m.