Triple
T2605260
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rudyard Kipling |
E58642
|
entity |
| Predicate | livedIn |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vermont |
E9978
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vermont | Statement: [Rudyard Kipling, livedIn, Vermont]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Vermont Context triple: [Rudyard Kipling, livedIn, Vermont]
-
A.
Vermont
chosen
Vermont is a small, rural New England state in the northeastern United States, known for its Green Mountains, maple syrup production, and picturesque towns.
-
B.
New Hampshire
New Hampshire is a small New England state in the northeastern United States known for its mountainous landscapes, early presidential primary, and “Live Free or Die” motto.
-
C.
Maine
Maine is a northeastern U.S. state known for its rugged coastline, maritime history, and vast forested interior.
-
D.
Maine
Maine is a historical region in northwestern France that played a significant role in the medieval power struggles between the English and French crowns.
-
E.
Warren, Vermont
Warren, Vermont is a small New England town in the Mad River Valley known for its scenic mountain setting, outdoor recreation, and proximity to Sugarbush Resort.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac3523881909679750c9f8c2dec |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd864958c8190b3ad6123f1ac78ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b4e4b980888190a7df10662789f61e |
completed | March 14, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.