Triple
T25979488
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prague Zoo |
E646028
|
entity |
| Predicate | specializesInConservationOf |
P68322
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Przewalski's horse |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Przewalski's horse | Statement: [Prague Zoo, specializesInConservationOf, Przewalski's horse]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: specializesInConservationOf Context triple: [Prague Zoo, specializesInConservationOf, Przewalski's horse]
-
A.
conservationFocusSpecies
chosen
Indicates that a conservation effort, program, or context is specifically directed toward or centered on a particular species.
-
B.
conservationFocus
Indicates that the primary emphasis or priority of an entity, project, or action is on conservation-related goals, activities, or outcomes.
-
C.
conservationTool
Indicates that an entity functions as a tool, method, or resource used to support or carry out conservation activities or objectives.
-
D.
conservationListedBy
Indicates that an entity is recognized or recorded as a conservation concern by a specific authority, organization, or listing body.
-
E.
hasConservationConcernIn
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e881fc08190ba1c8dc7e2a07f97 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61f12b0f08190bc4a16907941864c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b3a8ae0819090189fbd8eb19f2f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:54 a.m.