Triple
T2595752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Argeiphontes |
E58225
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedDeityDomain |
P9989
|
FINISHED |
| Object | messenger god |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: messenger god | Statement: [Argeiphontes, associatedDeityDomain, messenger god]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDeityDomain Context triple: [Argeiphontes, associatedDeityDomain, messenger god]
-
A.
relatedNameOfGod
Indicates that one entity is a name, title, or designation that refers to or is associated with God.
-
B.
sharesDeitiesWith
Indicates that two entities have one or more deities in common within their respective religious or mythological systems.
-
C.
hasDeity
Indicates that one entity recognizes, worships, or is associated with another entity as its deity or divine figure.
-
D.
otherDeity
Indicates that one deity is distinct from and not identical to another deity within a given context or system.
-
E.
typeOfDeity
chosen
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific kind or category of deity in relation to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac14040819098b13f4a27d5c8ff |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd42978f881909f217e7ec9ac3144 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0d344988190a18dd93b13e002e6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.