Triple

T2594053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Argersinger v. Hamlin E58186 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff E58186 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff | Statement: [Argersinger v. Hamlin, fullCaseName, Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff
Context triple: [Argersinger v. Hamlin, fullCaseName, Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff]
  • A. Argersinger v. Hamlin chosen
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • B. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • C. Light v. United States
    Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
  • D. Jurek v. Texas
    Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
  • E. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac019c8819094add11c46706e32 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd427f58c8190af1c1a9724158c96 completed March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af83bee4908190b5e446ddbf4e8889 completed March 10, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.