Triple

T2593510
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States presidential election, 1972 E58178 entity
Predicate popularVoteLoserPercentage P6370 FINISHED
Object 37.5% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 37.5% | Statement: [United States presidential election, 1972, popularVoteLoserPercentage, 37.5%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: popularVoteLoserPercentage
Context triple: [United States presidential election, 1972, popularVoteLoserPercentage, 37.5%]
  • A. popularVotePercentageLoser chosen
    Indicates the percentage of the total popular vote received by the candidate or party that did not win the election.
  • B. popularVoteLoser
    Indicates that the subject became the winner of an election despite receiving fewer popular votes than at least one opponent.
  • C. smithPopularVotePercentage
    Indicates the percentage of the popular vote that was received by the entity named Smith in a given election or voting context.
  • D. voterTurnoutPercentage
    Indicates the proportion of eligible or registered voters who actually cast a ballot in a given election, expressed as a percentage.
  • E. popularVoteMargin
    Indicates the difference in the number or percentage of popular votes received by two candidates or options in an election.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac019c8819094add11c46706e32 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd426e2d4819081a07920b4d2a1cc completed March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0d344988190a18dd93b13e002e6 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.