Triple
T25926909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manning Award |
E653329
|
entity |
| Predicate | selectionIncludes |
P162905
|
FINISHED |
| Object | College Football Playoff games |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: College Football Playoff games | Statement: [Manning Award, selectionIncludes, College Football Playoff games]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: selectionIncludes Context triple: [Manning Award, selectionIncludes, College Football Playoff games]
-
A.
selectedWith
Indicates that one entity is chosen or picked in conjunction with, or as part of a set including, another entity.
-
B.
includedWith
Indicates that one entity is provided or packaged together as part of another entity.
-
C.
includesClause
Indicates that one entity (typically a document, contract, or statement) contains or incorporates a specific clause as part of its content.
-
D.
evaluationCriteriaInclude
Indicates that certain criteria are part of, or explicitly included in, the set of standards used to evaluate something.
-
E.
sourcesInclude
Indicates that one entity’s content, data, or information is derived from, references, or incorporates material from another specified source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3eb9b881909c1390690551f868 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62e83045c8190a424a2e401a88e9e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1379f08190836c3e02b0c892df |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62d886828819080ec2f742b9449e3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:35 a.m.