Triple

T2591462
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lavender Mist (Number 1, 1950) E58129 entity
Predicate hasNoConventionalFocalPoint P40590 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Lavender Mist (Number 1, 1950), hasNoConventionalFocalPoint, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoConventionalFocalPoint
Context triple: [Lavender Mist (Number 1, 1950), hasNoConventionalFocalPoint, true]
  • A. hasFocalPlane
    Indicates that an optical system or imaging device possesses a specific focal plane where light is brought into focus.
  • B. hasNotableCenter
    Indicates that an entity possesses a significant or distinguished central location, facility, or hub associated with it.
  • C. hasNotableFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
  • D. hasNoDepictionOf
    Indicates that the subject lacks any visual or graphical representation of the specified object or concept.
  • E. hasFocalRatioRange
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a range of possible focal ratios, specifying the minimum and maximum f-number values it can have.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac019c8819094add11c46706e32 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd425851c819088db89713c07056f completed March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0d19308819089ee942513d567a4 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd37ef248819090ab6b86b67e355f completed March 7, 2026, 7:27 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.