Triple

T2584677
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alfonso Lopez Jr. E57170 entity
Predicate caseCitation P771 FINISHED
Object United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) E7030 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) | Statement: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., caseCitation, United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995)
Context triple: [Alfonso Lopez Jr., caseCitation, United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995)]
  • A. United States v. Lopez chosen
    United States v. Lopez is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked the first time in decades the Court struck down a federal law for exceeding Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, signaling a revival of limits on federal regulatory authority.
  • B. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • C. Gonzales v. Raich
    Gonzales v. Raich is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause, even when states permit it for medical purposes.
  • D. Plyler v. Doe
    Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • E. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a4dca6481908c301f8e317396e7 completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd3cd07588190b3cb8cc348f12938 completed March 7, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af98adae948190a08ffa1eef4cb91a completed March 10, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.