Triple
T25846621
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 110-85 |
E651087
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEnactmentDate |
P1260
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2007-09-27 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2007-09-27 | Statement: [Public Law 110-85, hasEnactmentDate, 2007-09-27]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEnactmentDate Context triple: [Public Law 110-85, hasEnactmentDate, 2007-09-27]
-
A.
enactedAfter
Indicates that one enactment event occurred later in time than another enactment event.
-
B.
dateOfEnactment
Indicates the specific calendar date on which a law, regulation, or formal measure officially comes into force.
-
C.
dateEnacted
chosen
Indicates the date on which a law, policy, or formal measure was officially put into effect or became legally operative.
-
D.
enactedDuring
Indicates that an action, event, or state occurred within the temporal span of a specified time period or event.
-
E.
hasExecutionDate
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific date on which an execution or carrying out of an action, order, or sentence is scheduled or took place.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab38086081908f3a8e7e0c6efd83 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65aa07c048190a5df30d53d8f0cf5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f659cc571c819097e51e531961d812 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:53 a.m.