Triple
T2579663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
E57057
|
entity |
| Predicate | canDeclareUnconstitutional |
P2944
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oklahoma statutes in civil cases |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oklahoma statutes in civil cases | Statement: [Oklahoma Supreme Court, canDeclareUnconstitutional, Oklahoma statutes in civil cases]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canDeclareUnconstitutional Context triple: [Oklahoma Supreme Court, canDeclareUnconstitutional, Oklahoma statutes in civil cases]
-
A.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
B.
canDeclare
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to formally declare or announce something about another entity or situation.
-
C.
yearDeclaredUnconstitutional
Indicates the specific year in which a law, policy, or legal provision was officially ruled unconstitutional.
-
D.
isConstitutionalAuthority
Indicates that an entity holds recognized legal or institutional power derived from or defined by a constitution.
-
E.
usesConstitution
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or operates according to a particular constitution as its guiding legal or organizational framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4dca6481908c301f8e317396e7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd3a9fd3c8190a521931e40cd801c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0cfeae08190aed03866ba071c5c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.