Triple
T25784549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Fanfan |
E649384
|
entity |
| Predicate | arguedWith |
P159262
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Booker |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Booker | Statement: [United States v. Fanfan, arguedWith, United States v. Booker]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: arguedWith Context triple: [United States v. Fanfan, arguedWith, United States v. Booker]
-
A.
rearguedWith
Indicates that one party presented arguments again or renewed a previous debate or legal argument with another party.
-
B.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
C.
arguesFrom
Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
-
D.
reargued
Indicates that an argument, case, or issue was presented and debated again, typically after having been argued previously.
-
E.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fef935a8819083bc9cefa4a72f8e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f497b8abb88190bb672cf6907c4b8d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:53 a.m.