Triple
T25784433
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gonzales v. Carhart |
E649381
|
entity |
| Predicate | overrulesInEffect |
P92639
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stenberg v. Carhart (in part, regarding similar state ban) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stenberg v. Carhart (in part, regarding similar state ban) | Statement: [Gonzales v. Carhart, overrulesInEffect, Stenberg v. Carhart (in part, regarding similar state ban)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: overrulesInEffect Context triple: [Gonzales v. Carhart, overrulesInEffect, Stenberg v. Carhart (in part, regarding similar state ban)]
-
A.
canOverrule
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to reverse, nullify, or supersede the decision or judgment made by another entity.
-
B.
overturnsInEffect
chosen
Indicates that one action, decision, or rule reverses and nullifies the current effect or validity of another.
-
C.
overshadowedBy
Indicates that one entity’s importance, visibility, or impact is diminished because another entity is more prominent or dominant.
-
D.
overrides
Indicates that one entity replaces, supersedes, or takes precedence over another in determining the outcome or applicable behavior.
-
E.
overruledByStatute
Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or principle has been superseded or invalidated by a later-enacted statute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fef935a8819083bc9cefa4a72f8e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938b960081909b53c074a3e0c7c2 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:53 a.m.