Triple
T25784402
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gonzales v. Carhart |
E649381
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal constitutional law case |
C734
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: federal constitutional law case Context triple: [Gonzales v. Carhart, instanceOf, federal constitutional law case]
-
A.
constitutional law case
chosen
A constitutional law case is a legal dispute that requires a court to interpret and apply a nation's constitution to determine the validity of government actions, laws, or policies.
-
B.
federal jurisdiction case
A federal jurisdiction case is a legal dispute that is heard in a federal court because it involves federal laws, the U.S. Constitution, the federal government, or parties from different states meeting specific jurisdictional requirements.
-
C.
constitutional law topic
A constitutional law topic is a specific subject area concerning the interpretation, application, or structure of a nation's constitution, including the distribution of governmental powers and the protection of individual rights.
-
D.
constitutional law
Constitutional law is the body of legal principles and rules that defines the structure, powers, and limits of government and protects fundamental rights under a nation's constitution.
-
E.
federal law
A federal law is a legally binding rule or statute enacted by a national government’s legislative body that applies uniformly across all states or regions within that nation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab33e9308190afe415dc6f9e8876 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 5:53 a.m.