Triple
T25715419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | London–Tokyo |
E644848
|
entity |
| Predicate | IATACodeCity2 |
P2569
|
FINISHED |
| Object | TYO |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TYO | Statement: [London–Tokyo, IATACodeCity2, TYO]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: IATACodeCity2 Context triple: [London–Tokyo, IATACodeCity2, TYO]
-
A.
IATAcode
Indicates the three-letter IATA airport or airline code assigned to the entity.
-
B.
hasIATAcode
chosen
Indicates that an entity, typically a transportation facility like an airport, is associated with a specific IATA (International Air Transport Association) code.
-
C.
ICCCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific International Criminal Court (ICC) code, identifying its classification or legal reference under ICC standards.
-
D.
icaoCodeType
Indicates that the relationship specifies or classifies the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) code associated with an entity.
-
E.
ISOCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific standardized code defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8476fc8190bd5e9d05b89fad0a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fc6211788190bb46c645902c2bc2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4938262ac8190b41f922d0407d272 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 9:40 p.m.