Triple

T25706897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Craggy-Tops E644615 entity
Predicate hasNearbyFictionalFeature P172756 FINISHED
Object a mysterious island LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: a mysterious island | Statement: [Craggy-Tops, hasNearbyFictionalFeature, a mysterious island]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNearbyFictionalFeature
Context triple: [Craggy-Tops, hasNearbyFictionalFeature, a mysterious island]
  • A. hasFictionalLandmark
    Indicates that one entity includes, features, or is associated with a landmark that is fictional rather than real.
  • B. neighborOfFictional
    Indicates that one fictional entity is located next to or in close proximity to another fictional entity within a narrative or imagined setting.
  • C. hasFictionalNearbyTown
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a fictional town located in its vicinity or surrounding area.
  • D. hasFictionalLocation
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, set in, or takes place within a location that exists only in fiction rather than in the real world.
  • E. meetsFictionalCharacter
    Indicates that one entity encounters or comes into contact with a fictional character.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e77e83c8ec8190bf52fcdac4838984 completed April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b0d21dd08190a9883ff71c94c71c completed May 3, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca204148190850a3dc325bc07b7 completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6afeaaef88190aefa97e83f8db906 completed May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 9:05 p.m.