Triple
T2569963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eastern Georgia |
E57639
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEthnicMinority |
P4710
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ossetian |
E16191
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ossetian | Statement: [Eastern Georgia, hasEthnicMinority, Ossetian]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ossetian Context triple: [Eastern Georgia, hasEthnicMinority, Ossetian]
-
A.
Ossetian language
The Ossetian language is an Eastern Iranian language spoken primarily in the Caucasus region of Russia, especially in North and South Ossetia.
-
B.
Lezgian
Lezgian is a Northeast Caucasian language spoken primarily by the Lezgin people in southern Dagestan and northern Azerbaijan.
-
C.
Abkhaz–Abaza
Abkhaz–Abaza is a small Northwest Caucasian language subgroup comprising closely related languages spoken primarily in Abkhazia and parts of the North Caucasus.
-
D.
Erzya language
The Erzya language is a Uralic, Finno-Volgaic language spoken primarily by the Erzya Mordvin people in central Russia.
-
E.
Ossetians
chosen
Ossetians are an Iranian-speaking ethnic group native to the central Caucasus, primarily inhabiting the region of Ossetia divided between Russia and Georgia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a51410081908501dcf8bad9adc4 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd382928c8190b6316f3db48d8e73 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69af83a9c1988190b311da7b3f6b1413 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:48 p.m.