Triple

T2568638
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Plyler v. Doe E57611 entity
Predicate challengedPolicy P2159 FINISHED
Object Denial of state funds for education of undocumented children LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Denial of state funds for education of undocumented children | Statement: [Plyler v. Doe, challengedPolicy, Denial of state funds for education of undocumented children]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedPolicy
Context triple: [Plyler v. Doe, challengedPolicy, Denial of state funds for education of undocumented children]
  • A. challengedStatute
    Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
  • B. languagePolicyIssue
    Indicates that there is a problem, conflict, or concern related to rules or practices governing language use.
  • C. canBeChallengedOn
    Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
  • D. disputePolicy chosen
    Indicates that there is a formal disagreement or conflict regarding a policy, typically triggering procedures for review, negotiation, or resolution.
  • E. precedentChallenged
    Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a51410081908501dcf8bad9adc4 completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd36191848190b6255fa9029429bd completed March 7, 2026, 7:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0cc8d308190ae7aa32b8f5ae2e5 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:48 p.m.