Triple
T25629988
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CONAP |
E642543
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfProtectedAreasSystem |
P179449
|
FINISHED |
| Object | national system of protected areas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: national system of protected areas | Statement: [CONAP, typeOfProtectedAreasSystem, national system of protected areas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfProtectedAreasSystem Context triple: [CONAP, typeOfProtectedAreasSystem, national system of protected areas]
-
A.
typeOfProtectedAreasManaged
Indicates the specific categories or kinds of protected areas that an entity is responsible for managing.
-
B.
countryProtectedAreaSystem
Indicates that a country has an established system or network of designated protected areas under its jurisdiction.
-
C.
stateProtectedAreaType
Indicates that an area is designated as a specific type or category of state-protected area.
-
D.
relatedProtectedAreaType
Indicates that one protected area is associated with another through a specific type of protected-area relationship or classification.
-
E.
stateProtectedAreaSystem
Indicates that an area is part of a state-level protected area system, managed or designated under state jurisdiction for conservation or protection purposes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7bd4548190a0c691b8a2f27ff1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f722c1bc648190a79bfdc722dcaaa4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72153a9188190b02adc84e1be4af8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7221bc57c819085c1464a45e61b2f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:17 p.m.