Triple
T25625922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agreement of the People |
E642428
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedRight |
P159781
|
FINISHED |
| Object | freedom of conscience |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: freedom of conscience | Statement: [Agreement of the People, proposedRight, freedom of conscience]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedRight Context triple: [Agreement of the People, proposedRight, freedom of conscience]
-
A.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
B.
proposedPart
Indicates that one entity has been suggested or put forward to serve as a component or element of another entity.
-
C.
wereProposedBy
Indicates that one or more entities (such as ideas, plans, or items) were put forward or suggested by a specific agent or source.
-
D.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
-
E.
coProposedBy
Indicates that a proposal, idea, or item is jointly put forward or suggested by multiple entities together.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7bd4548190a0c691b8a2f27ff1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5fa2393348190ba0d0717b371e2b1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5afec3e94819080d9ba86cf8c866e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:14 p.m.