Triple

T25602111
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject OWL 2 functional-style syntax E641813 entity
Predicate hasExampleConstruct P1259 FINISHED
Object Ontology(...) expression LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ontology(...) expression | Statement: [OWL 2 functional-style syntax, hasExampleConstruct, Ontology(...) expression]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExampleConstruct
Context triple: [OWL 2 functional-style syntax, hasExampleConstruct, Ontology(...) expression]
  • A. hasExample chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as an instance, illustration, or concrete example of another entity.
  • B. hasExampleType
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific type or category of example that characterizes or illustrates it.
  • C. hasExampleImplementation
    Indicates that an entity is accompanied by a concrete implementation that serves as an example of how it can be realized or used.
  • D. hasExampleProvider
    Indicates that one entity serves as an example provider or source of illustrative instances for another entity.
  • E. hasNonExample
    Indicates that something is associated with an instance that explicitly does not satisfy or illustrate a given concept, rule, or category.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75dc60d108190b7e2419e36b0134b completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f661b58ac48190907b6c6e9ccc2c59 completed May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f660eea4648190b0d5e24293607813 completed May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 4:31 p.m.