Triple
T2559623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NATO–Russia relations |
E57210
|
entity |
| Predicate | RussianViewOnNATOEnlargement |
P40467
|
FINISHED |
| Object | security threat |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: security threat | Statement: [NATO–Russia relations, RussianViewOnNATOEnlargement, security threat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: RussianViewOnNATOEnlargement Context triple: [NATO–Russia relations, RussianViewOnNATOEnlargement, security threat]
-
A.
moveOfNATOFrom
Indicates a movement or deployment action carried out by NATO originating from a specified location.
-
B.
positionOnEuropeanIntegration
Indicates a stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding the process, policies, or degree of European integration.
-
C.
NATOAccessionYear
Indicates the year in which an entity formally became a member of NATO.
-
D.
politicalPositionOnEuropeanUnion
Indicates a stance or viewpoint that an entity holds regarding the policies, membership, or role of the European Union.
-
E.
positionOnRussia
Indicates the stance, opinion, or policy that one entity holds regarding Russia.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4ef9008190a0e6d4422b9418b7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd35c6ee88190b6eaa1841d3e99a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0caeb488190b0dd8e48d0f2777d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd35b216881908f4ef32d1c1e5080 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:48 p.m.