Triple
T25519968
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Konishi Yukinaga |
E639618
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultOfSekigahara |
P164792
|
FINISHED |
| Object | captured by Tokugawa forces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: captured by Tokugawa forces | Statement: [Konishi Yukinaga, resultOfSekigahara, captured by Tokugawa forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultOfSekigahara Context triple: [Konishi Yukinaga, resultOfSekigahara, captured by Tokugawa forces]
-
A.
sideInBattleOfSekigahara
Indicates that an entity participated as a side or faction in the Battle of Sekigahara.
-
B.
opponentAtSekigahara
Indicates that two entities were opposing sides against each other in the Battle of Sekigahara.
-
C.
lastShogun
Indicates that the subject is the final individual to hold the position or title of shogun in a given historical or organizational context.
-
D.
successorAsDaimyoOfHikone
Indicates that one entity became the next daimyō (feudal lord) of Hikone, directly succeeding another in that position.
-
E.
lastDaimyo
Indicates that the subject is the final or most recent daimyo (feudal lord) to hold authority over the object.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75dbe32e48190a62d749a0ff2a96a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f650fc44e48190bc0e0a935eac62a6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64cab1f648190a2a9460690d18a37 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f650c466b881908954e43bfebae8a4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:59 p.m.