Triple

T253079
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wisconsin v. Yoder E5192 entity
Predicate SupremeCourtDisposition P2931 FINISHED
Object Affirmed the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Affirmed the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court | Statement: [Wisconsin v. Yoder, SupremeCourtDisposition, Affirmed the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SupremeCourtDisposition
Context triple: [Wisconsin v. Yoder, SupremeCourtDisposition, Affirmed the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court]
  • A. chiefJusticeAtDecision
    Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
  • B. legalOutcome chosen
    Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
  • C. finalDisposition
    Indicates the ultimate outcome, status, or resolution assigned to an entity after all relevant processes or decisions are complete.
  • D. wasOverturnedByCourt
    Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
  • E. notableSupremeCourtCase
    Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2611e83288190afbad5481dbbc13d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a260bf99d88190b0233e145313a7bb completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:27 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.