Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: George Reynolds was prosecuted for bigamy under federal law in the Utah Territory | Statement: [Reynolds v. United States, factPattern, George Reynolds was prosecuted for bigamy under federal law in the Utah Territory]

Target entity: George Reynolds was prosecuted for bigamy under federal law in the Utah Territory
Context triple: [Reynolds v. United States, factPattern, George Reynolds was prosecuted for bigamy under federal law in the Utah Territory]

• A. Reynolds v. United States chosen
  Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
• B. Reed v. Reed
  Reed v. Reed is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that for the first time struck down a law for discriminating on the basis of sex under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• C. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, on narrow grounds, that Colorado officials had shown unconstitutional hostility toward a baker’s religious beliefs when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against his refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
• D. Briggs v. Elliott
  Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
• E. Bond v. United States
  Bond v. United States is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified an individual’s ability to raise Tenth Amendment challenges to federal statutes, reinforcing limits on federal power in favor of state sovereignty.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: factPattern
Context triple: [Reynolds v. United States, factPattern, George Reynolds was prosecuted for bigamy under federal law in the Utah Territory]

• A. notationPattern
  Indicates a recurring way in which something is symbolically represented or written, such as a consistent style or structure of notation used for an entity or concept.
• B. phenomenon
  Indicates that an entity is a perceptible event, occurrence, or process that can be observed or experienced.
• C. fieldPattern
  Indicates a recurring or structured arrangement or configuration present within a field or area.
• D. fault
  Indicates that one entity is responsible or at blame for a problem, error, or undesirable outcome involving another entity or situation.
• E. kitPattern
  Indicates the design or visual pattern featured on a team's kit or uniform.
• F. None of above. chosen