Triple

T25274072
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject National First Division E633646 entity
Predicate matchOutcomeTiebreakers P6631 FINISHED
Object goals scored LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: goals scored | Statement: [National First Division, matchOutcomeTiebreakers, goals scored]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: matchOutcomeTiebreakers
Context triple: [National First Division, matchOutcomeTiebreakers, goals scored]
  • A. useTiebreakers
    Indicates that when primary criteria result in a tie, additional predefined rules or factors are applied to determine a winner or ordering.
  • B. fairPlayTiebreakerAffectedTeams
    Indicates that the teams involved were impacted by a tiebreaker decision based on fair play criteria (such as disciplinary records).
  • C. tiebreaker chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the deciding factor used to break a tie between two or more otherwise equal options or outcomes.
  • D. usesHeadToHeadAsTiebreaker
    Indicates that a head-to-head comparison between entities is used to break a tie in their ranking or outcome.
  • E. tiebreakerGameLoser
    Indicates the player or team that lost a specific tiebreaker game used to resolve a tie in a competition or match.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a92f48881909974ff9c11150a2e completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f48ba5024c8190acce739b3b97bdb8 completed May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f4806d93dc8190b9dff4c63186faff completed May 1, 2026, 10:29 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:17 p.m.