Triple

T251874
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Standard Theory E5165 entity
Predicate areaOfStudy P934 FINISHED
Object theoretical linguistics LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theoretical linguistics | Statement: [Standard Theory, areaOfStudy, theoretical linguistics]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areaOfStudy
Context triple: [Standard Theory, areaOfStudy, theoretical linguistics]
  • A. academicFocus
    Indicates the primary field of study, discipline, or subject area that an entity concentrates on academically.
  • B. hasResearchArea chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as a person, project, or organization) is associated with or focused on a particular field or area of research.
  • C. studiedBy
    Indicates that a subject (such as a field, topic, or object) is examined, researched, or learned by an agent (such as a person or group).
  • D. offersFieldOfStudy
    Indicates that an institution or program provides a particular field of study as an available area of academic focus.
  • E. studiedUnder
    Indicates that one entity received instruction, training, or mentorship from another, typically in an academic or apprenticeship context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25d39eb3881909f435043c8697f13 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b678d6c81909780e1995c1ca691 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.