Triple
T25073789
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jacobson radical |
E627993
|
entity |
| Predicate | isIdealOf |
P34839
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ring R |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ring R | Statement: [Jacobson radical, isIdealOf, ring R]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isIdealOf Context triple: [Jacobson radical, isIdealOf, ring R]
-
A.
maximalIdealGeneratedBy
Indicates that a given ideal is the largest (maximal) ideal of a ring that is generated by the specified element(s).
-
B.
isIntegralFormOf
Indicates that one entity is the integral (indefinite integral or antiderivative) form corresponding to another entity, typically a derivative or differential expression.
-
C.
isIntegralCombinationOf
Indicates that one entity can be expressed as a linear combination of other entities using only integer coefficients.
-
D.
isSubquotientOf
Indicates that one object can be obtained from another by first taking a subobject and then forming a quotient of that subobject.
-
E.
idealOfSetNotation
chosen
Indicates that one mathematical object is an ideal of another object, expressed using set-theoretic notation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2d71dc8190b4758e57d643cbe4 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f45d177c3881909ac5058e3e866d93 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c861188190967655c6d8012380 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:20 a.m.