Triple
T25069846
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thoas |
E627877
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedToMythicFigure |
P86125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Iphigenia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Iphigenia | Statement: [Thoas, relatedToMythicFigure, Iphigenia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedToMythicFigure Context triple: [Thoas, relatedToMythicFigure, Iphigenia]
-
A.
linkedToMythology
Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
-
B.
mythologicalFigureFeatured
Indicates that a mythological figure is prominently depicted, referenced, or plays a significant role within a given work, context, or medium.
-
C.
hasMythicalFigure
chosen
Indicates that one entity is associated with, features, or includes a particular mythical or legendary figure.
-
D.
relatedMythicalPlace
Indicates that one entity has an association or connection with a mythical or legendary place in relation to the other entity.
-
E.
associatedMystic
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to another through a mystical, spiritual, or esoteric association.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2d71dc8190b4758e57d643cbe4 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d0d46aec819091edf97324d793ac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:10 a.m.