Triple

T25042014
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aboriginal rights movement in Australia E627137 entity
Predicate seeksToOverturn P157571 FINISHED
Object doctrine of terra nullius in Australian law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doctrine of terra nullius in Australian law | Statement: [Aboriginal rights movement in Australia, seeksToOverturn, doctrine of terra nullius in Australian law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seeksToOverturn
Context triple: [Aboriginal rights movement in Australia, seeksToOverturn, doctrine of terra nullius in Australian law]
  • A. overturnedLaw
    Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
  • B. wasOverturnedByCourt
    Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
  • C. overturnedDecisionOf
    Indicates that one decision reversed, nullified, or set aside a previous decision.
  • D. overturnedPractice
    Indicates that a previously established practice, rule, or precedent has been reversed or invalidated by a later decision or action.
  • E. overturnsInEffect
    Indicates that one action, decision, or rule reverses and nullifies the current effect or validity of another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2b4c80819087c916b2b16241b9 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f4530c59688190a7006c6948cc7073 completed May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442c861188190967655c6d8012380 completed May 1, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f448fe11f08190bdd53ca7ba2d51e4 completed May 1, 2026, 6:32 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:08 a.m.