Triple
T25027797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Israeli law |
E626756
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHighestCourtOfAppeal |
P52844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of Israel |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of Israel | Statement: [Israeli law, hasHighestCourtOfAppeal, Supreme Court of Israel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHighestCourtOfAppeal Context triple: [Israeli law, hasHighestCourtOfAppeal, Supreme Court of Israel]
-
A.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
B.
previousHighestCourtOfAppeal
Indicates that one court previously served as the highest court of appeal for another jurisdiction or legal system.
-
C.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
officeHoldsInHighestCourtOf
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or role within the highest court of a specified jurisdiction.
-
E.
highestCourtType
Indicates the type or category of the supreme or top-level court that has ultimate judicial authority over a given jurisdiction or case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff28ee3881909c626af002457a4a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63fd6c68481908c542aa03e297b9c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6456608190b94e7c2e2c2a4824 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:07 a.m.