Triple
T25006344
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wall |
E625849
|
entity |
| Predicate | accessToMagicalRealmControlledBy |
P15393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gap in the wall |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gap in the wall | Statement: [Wall, accessToMagicalRealmControlledBy, gap in the wall]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accessToMagicalRealmControlledBy Context triple: [Wall, accessToMagicalRealmControlledBy, gap in the wall]
-
A.
magicalObjectThatControls
Indicates a relationship where one magical object has the power to direct, influence, or command another entity or force.
-
B.
accessedBySpell
Indicates that something is reached, activated, or utilized through the use of a spell.
-
C.
guardedEntranceTo
Indicates that one entity serves as a protective or controlling barrier for access to another entity’s entrance.
-
D.
controlsAccessTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity regulates, manages, or determines the ability of another entity to reach, use, or interact with a resource, location, or service.
-
E.
hasImaginaryControlOver
Indicates a perceived or illusory ability of one entity to direct, influence, or command another, without any actual control existing in reality.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff26c50481908bc82e799c9e6587 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f47b865df48190bf4b6d3e9f9305e6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4682c8a3c8190adbfaac99474eaaf |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:05 a.m.