Triple

T24935300
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Siege of Busan (1592) E623295 entity
Predicate outcomeForDefender P6933 FINISHED
Object destruction of Busan garrison LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: destruction of Busan garrison | Statement: [Siege of Busan (1592), outcomeForDefender, destruction of Busan garrison]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outcomeForDefender
Context triple: [Siege of Busan (1592), outcomeForDefender, destruction of Busan garrison]
  • A. defenseResult chosen
    Indicates the outcome or consequence of a defensive action or strategy in response to an attack or threat.
  • B. awardedToDefenders
    Indicates that something (such as a title, honor, or recognition) is granted specifically to entities serving in a defensive role.
  • C. defender
    Indicates a relationship where one entity protects, guards, or supports another entity against threats, attacks, or criticism.
  • D. defenderIn
    Indicates that an entity serves as a defensive agent or protector within a specified context, situation, or domain.
  • E. tacticalOutcome
    Indicates the specific result or consequence produced by a particular tactic or tactical action in a given situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fac6b5a48190a1c38857f00915a9 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442b8479c8190a7c8e416ac9e28a0 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:30 a.m.