Triple
T24933786
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Metcard |
E623257
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadConcessionOption |
P157252
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Metcard, hadConcessionOption, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadConcessionOption Context triple: [Metcard, hadConcessionOption, yes]
-
A.
hasConcessions
Indicates that one entity provides or contains concession facilities, services, or rights (such as food, drink, or merchandise sales) for another entity or within a given context.
-
B.
concessionFor
Indicates a relationship where one party grants or yields something—such as rights, privileges, or resources—to another, often as part of a negotiation or agreement.
-
C.
concessionBy
Indicates that one party grants, yields, or makes allowances to another, often accepting a demand, point, or condition despite initial opposition or differing interests.
-
D.
concessionExtended
Indicates that one party has granted or prolonged a special allowance, discount, or favorable term to another party.
-
E.
demandedConcessionTo
Indicates that one party insisted another party grant a concession, typically as a condition or requirement in a negotiation or conflict.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac6b5a48190a1c38857f00915a9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f423b654e48190b9a073a67cbf82f3 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4210130d08190ae30b7943f7a0bbc |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f423637bec8190a1701421ac86a3b7 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 3:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:30 a.m.