Triple
T24926770
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paula Rosalee Corbin |
E618878
|
entity |
| Predicate | lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtCase |
P17092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Clinton v. Jones |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clinton v. Jones | Statement: [Paula Rosalee Corbin, lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtCase, Clinton v. Jones]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtCase Context triple: [Paula Rosalee Corbin, lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtCase, Clinton v. Jones]
-
A.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
B.
SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
-
E.
associatedCourtCase
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fab9edd88190b86004a78a28bc20 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f606c79ad081908369605f72e65ca6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:29 a.m.