Triple

T24879161
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Richard Wright: Daemonic Genius E622653 entity
Predicate subjectEthnicityDiscussed P138422 FINISHED
Object African American LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: African American | Statement: [Richard Wright: Daemonic Genius, subjectEthnicityDiscussed, African American]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectEthnicityDiscussed
Context triple: [Richard Wright: Daemonic Genius, subjectEthnicityDiscussed, African American]
  • A. sharesEthnicity
    Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
  • B. EthnicaSubject chosen
    Indicates that the subject has an ethnic or national affiliation characterized by the specified ethnonym or ethnic identity.
  • C. holderEthnicity
    Indicates the ethnic background or group to which the holder of something (e.g., a document, account, or item) belongs.
  • D. ethnicGroupInFocus
    Indicates that a particular ethnic group is the primary subject or focal point within a given context, relation, or description.
  • E. otherEthnicGroup
    Indicates that one entity belongs to a different ethnic group than the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fac4aa848190b3446a3922cec150 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f43043512481909501a3979cac9947 completed May 1, 2026, 4:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f420fd375c81908ea4a4e60b76ee8f completed May 1, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:24 a.m.