Triple
T248401
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NBA rules |
E5086
|
entity |
| Predicate | prohibit |
P272
|
FINISHED |
| Object | zone defense restrictions prior to 2001 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: zone defense restrictions prior to 2001 | Statement: [NBA rules, prohibit, zone defense restrictions prior to 2001]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: prohibit Context triple: [NBA rules, prohibit, zone defense restrictions prior to 2001]
-
A.
prohibits
chosen
Indicates that one entity forbids or disallows another entity from performing a specific action or being in a certain state.
-
B.
discourages
Indicates an action or influence that deters, dissuades, or reduces the likelihood of someone performing a particular behavior or pursuing a certain outcome.
-
C.
restriction
Indicates a limiting condition or rule that constrains or controls what an entity can do, use, or access in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
plea
Indicates that a defendant formally states their response (such as guilty, not guilty, or no contest) to criminal charges in a legal proceeding.
-
E.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25d154ebc819087a5c9dc4f62ff44 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b64ea3081908de626a0e1445bdb |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.