Triple
T24823197
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Freyd–Mitchell embedding theorem |
E621113
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theorem in category theory |
C716
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: theorem in category theory Context triple: [Freyd–Mitchell embedding theorem, instanceOf, theorem in category theory]
-
A.
tool in category theory
A tool in category theory is a conceptual or formal construct—such as functors, natural transformations, limits, or adjunctions—used to analyze, relate, and systematically reason about mathematical structures and their morphisms within the categorical framework.
-
B.
mathematical theorem
chosen
A mathematical theorem is a rigorously proven statement derived from axioms and previously established results, expressing a fundamental truth within a formal mathematical system.
-
C.
theorem in theoretical physics
A theorem in theoretical physics is a rigorously proven statement, derived from fundamental physical principles and mathematical formalism, that holds universally within the specified theoretical framework.
-
D.
theorem in quantum foundations
A theorem in quantum foundations is a rigorously proven mathematical statement that clarifies or constrains the possible structures, interpretations, or empirical predictions of quantum theory at its most fundamental level.
-
E.
lemma in topology
A lemma in topology is a proven auxiliary statement about topological structures (such as open sets, continuity, or compactness) used as a stepping stone to establish more significant theorems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fabfd4648190bd0e5c7f4dbb6cab |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:05 a.m.