Triple
T248167
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | harpy eagle |
E5082
|
entity |
| Predicate | distinctiveFeature |
P7153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | massive talons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: massive talons | Statement: [harpy eagle, distinctiveFeature, massive talons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: distinctiveFeature Context triple: [harpy eagle, distinctiveFeature, massive talons]
-
A.
linguisticFeature
Indicates a relationship where a linguistic property, pattern, or characteristic is attributed to or associated with a language-related entity (such as a word, phrase, or text).
-
B.
keyFeature
chosen
Indicates that something is a primary, distinguishing, or most important feature of an entity.
-
C.
distinction
Indicates that one entity is recognized, treated, or classified as different or separate from another.
-
D.
typicalFeatures
Indicates that the related entities are characteristic or commonly occurring features or attributes of something.
-
E.
characterizedBy
Indicates that one entity possesses a defining quality, feature, or attribute expressed by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25d154ebc819087a5c9dc4f62ff44 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b64ea3081908de626a0e1445bdb |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.