Triple

T24734738
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1981 Division Series E618378 entity
Predicate permanentSuccessorRound P157066 FINISHED
Object Division Series established in 1995 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Division Series established in 1995 | Statement: [1981 Division Series, permanentSuccessorRound, Division Series established in 1995]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: permanentSuccessorRound
Context triple: [1981 Division Series, permanentSuccessorRound, Division Series established in 1995]
  • A. successorInCycle
    Indicates that one entity directly follows another as the next element in a repeating cyclic order.
  • B. successorRank
    Indicates that one entity holds the next higher position or rank in an ordered hierarchy relative to another entity.
  • C. successorInPractice
    Indicates that one entity has taken over the role, position, or function of another in actual practice, even if not formally or officially designated as its successor.
  • D. successorReceives
    Indicates that a successor entity obtains or is granted something (such as rights, assets, or responsibilities) from a predecessor.
  • E. successorProtocol
    Indicates that one protocol directly follows and replaces another in sequence or versioning.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fab772608190b74163751047ff50 completed April 18, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f410a25ab88190a72db43043c1f6ff completed May 1, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f40ef612c88190ab2f3f08d4a92018 completed May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f410a001788190a457e41f53aaf90c completed May 1, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:03 a.m.