Triple

T24680666
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Palouse Hills E611119 entity
Predicate erosionConcern P156966 FINISHED
Object soil erosion from water LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: soil erosion from water | Statement: [Palouse Hills, erosionConcern, soil erosion from water]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: erosionConcern
Context triple: [Palouse Hills, erosionConcern, soil erosion from water]
  • A. erosionRate
    Indicates the rate at which material is worn away or removed from a surface over time due to erosive processes.
  • B. hasErosionEffect
    Indicates that one entity causes or exhibits an erosive impact or degradation effect on another entity or surface.
  • C. erosionAgent
    Indicates the natural force or process responsible for wearing away, transporting, or reshaping material from a surface.
  • D. hasErosionFeature
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or contains a specific erosion-related feature or form resulting from erosional processes.
  • E. erosionResistance
    Indicates how strongly one entity can withstand or prevent being worn away, degraded, or removed by erosive forces caused by another entity or the environment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4d5c2dc8190ac857dea25ec6ce9 completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f41011d8048190be70329ba0bfb7c7 completed May 1, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f40ed9d47881909fcfc0d04e8d074a completed May 1, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f41010f06c81908ee7f773220df14f completed May 1, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:08 a.m.