Triple

T24634264
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Closer E609760 entity
Predicate hasCoverImageSubject P50487 FINISHED
Object tomb in Staglieno Cemetery LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tomb in Staglieno Cemetery | Statement: [Closer, hasCoverImageSubject, tomb in Staglieno Cemetery]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoverImageSubject
Context triple: [Closer, hasCoverImageSubject, tomb in Staglieno Cemetery]
  • A. containsCoverOf
    Indicates that one entity includes within it a cover or covering representation of another entity.
  • B. hasCoverFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a prominent or featured element on the cover of another entity (such as a publication, product, or media item).
  • C. hasCoverType
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific type or category of cover.
  • D. hasNotableCoverOrInterpolation
    Indicates that a work has a notable cover version or interpolation created by another artist.
  • E. hasAuthorityOnCover
    Indicates that one entity holds decision-making or control authority over the content, design, or use of another entity’s cover (e.g., a document, publication, or product).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4d28f848190ac38c400060e943d completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2be064ff88190b5d9e5ec75a41242 completed April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6d0ab708190b2e3b94dd20ca76b completed April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:32 a.m.