Triple
T24628347
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chile–Argentina relations |
E609602
|
entity |
| Predicate | includeTreaty |
P7982
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Boundary Treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boundary Treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina | Statement: [Chile–Argentina relations, includeTreaty, Boundary Treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includeTreaty Context triple: [Chile–Argentina relations, includeTreaty, Boundary Treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina]
-
A.
treatyMention
Indicates that a treaty is referenced or mentioned in relation to the associated entities or context.
-
B.
linkedToTreaty
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a formal connection or association with a specific treaty, such as being established by, governed by, or otherwise related to that treaty.
-
C.
treatyFeature
Indicates that one entity is a characteristic, provision, or specific element that forms part of a treaty.
-
D.
relevantSectionForTreaty
Indicates that a specific legal or textual section is pertinent or applicable to a given treaty.
-
E.
treatyImplemented
Indicates that the terms or provisions of a treaty have been put into effect or carried out in practice between the relevant parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4d1d3708190a0f2dc6a3a8523bb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2be044d4c819094e14eda28d371a7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6d0ab708190b2e3b94dd20ca76b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:32 a.m.