Triple
T2459437
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jesus Christ Superstar |
E54495
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsDialogue |
P19976
|
FINISHED |
| Object | minimal spoken dialogue |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: minimal spoken dialogue | Statement: [Jesus Christ Superstar, containsDialogue, minimal spoken dialogue]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsDialogue Context triple: [Jesus Christ Superstar, containsDialogue, minimal spoken dialogue]
-
A.
hasProseDialogue
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains or features spoken or conversational content expressed in prose form involving another entity.
-
B.
dialogueType
Indicates the specific kind or category of dialogue occurring between entities (e.g., question-answer, negotiation, instruction).
-
C.
dialogueWith
Indicates that two entities are engaged in a mutual conversational exchange or dialogue with each other.
-
D.
containsDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or features a discussion, treatment, or consideration of another entity as a topic or subject.
-
E.
dialogueForm
Indicates that one entity takes the form or structure of a dialogue, typically involving conversational or interactive exchange between parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49dee84c819096b50a0049c347ac |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd49c5aa081909ab4f726a458b77f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0b199488190aa381b36593ae1ac |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.